Leader as Coach

Coaching Insights Assessment

Explore how you approach everyday leadership conversations. Answer eight scenarios and two short reflection questions to discover the coaching moves you tend to reach for and one practical experiment to try.

A reflection on your choices, not a test of your ability. Enter your email at the end to view your report. Fran's newsletter is optional.

Choose what you would most likely do first, not what seems ideal. Several responses may be useful; choose the closest fit.

If none fits, choose the last option. After eight scenarios, you will reflect on two recent moments.

Scenario 1 of 80 of 10 answered
x

A full plate

A capable colleague brings you a difficult situation. They seem overwhelmed, and you have ten minutes before your next meeting.

What would you most likely do first?

Your answers stay in this page while it is open. Refreshing or closing it clears them. Your email is requested only before opening your report; your answers are not saved with it.

About this reflection and its limits

This original Good Works tool is theory-informed, not validated. It reflects choices in hypothetical situations and two recalled moments, not competence, personality, or effectiveness. It should not be used for hiring, promotion, or performance ratings.

The four coaching moves are Curiosity, Clarity, Care, and Accountability. These are distinct from the leadership roles Direct, Advise, Mentor, and Coach. Grounded presence supports all four. Content is informed by the ICF coaching competencies and Self-Determination Theory. Neither organization has endorsed or validated this tool.

There is no right-answer key or overall score. Each scenario response contributes one count to its main emphasis. The last option is excluded. A primary move is shown only with at least six specific scenario responses and at least three selections of the uniquely most-selected move. Tied leaders are shown as joint most-selected moves. A secondary move must be uniquely next most-selected and selected at least twice. Ties remain ties; we do not create a combined profile from a single answer. A combined interpretation is shown only with a primary and a secondary move. These are conservative display rules, not validated cutoffs. Choosing one response limits the opportunity to choose another, so the counts are not independent skill measures.

Scenarios do not remove social desirability or recall bias. Independent content review and participant testing are still pending. Changes across repeat visits should not be interpreted as evidence of growth.